what exactly is it that Activision did that is so bad? I think folks are just hating on them because they stood up to Sony. You guys hate anyone who does not have their head up Sony's @ss.
Also, the hypocrite point is weak, Activision asked Sony to lower the PS3 price because no one is buying it (buy Playstation standards)
Activision raised the price of MW2 because everyone will buy it, basic supply and demand, we're lucky more companies don't do the same, they would have e...
the norm, the norm amongst PC gamers is some dork who lives in his moms basement and games at his desk, where he also gets online goes to console gaming sites, and blabs on about how the PC is superior to all consoles. In most cases this same dork does not even have a PC capable of running half the stuff he claims is so superior on PC. This is the case even though he pours every penny he makes working at best buy into his rig, 3 grand in and 2 years later it is already incapable of running bi...
I was getting it on my 360 anyway, PC gaming is for geeks, I game on my sofa, with my surround sound, 50 inch TV and wife by my side. Not in my moms basement at my desk.
YES! sales are a very good indicator of those things you moron. Think about what you just asked. geez
@below no one is talking about quality, we are disscussing value, they are different things, the Honda Accord sales alot because it is a great value, the Ferrari 599 sales less because like the PS3, it is mostly a fanboys dream come true, not a value.
you are from the USA pal, cuz if you were you would know that Americans hate Microsoft, in fact Americans hate most things American, we are some of the most self loathing people on earth, thanks to people like our new president blaming America for every known evil that has ever existed in the universe, most ignorant Americans take the anti American position on just about everything.
I think what your trying to say is just wait till 2010 year of the PS3, or better yet just wait till GOW3 comes, then it's over for 360 wii and all evil in the world, just wait... wait beyond /end sarcasm
should this be difficult to believe. MS is in this business to make money. The 360 is getting more porfitable with every hardware revision, plus they are making gobs of cash off XBL and game sales. So why would they want to introduce a new console that sells at a loss, has no installed base, and makes them less money? Not like they have any threat from Sony to worry about? We won't see a PS4 for another 10 years if ever. So why is this hard for people to believe? Think people.
on PS3 and gimp the game so that PS3 can handle it, and we get crappy graphics on both consoles? Why should they do that?
we've heard that before too, in fact that is all you hacks ever say. You actually nailed stereotypical PS3 fanboy dead on in one sentence.
You got RROD and Killzone2 all in one comment LOL!
Put the Killzone development team on 360 and give them all the time in the world, gobs of support from MS, and financial backing to build an engine from the ground up custom made for 360, and I bet they could make Killzone 2 on 360 look even better than it does on PS3. You see there is n...
People shouldn't have to have a bunch of obsolete consoles cluttering their entertainment centers. Sony should have stuck to what they talked sh&t about MS for not doing and made all PS3s backwards compatible.
all you "this is why I hate Microsoft" people. Sony pulled the same crap when it pulled Sony movies from the Netflix roster on XBL.
You people are such hypocrites.
you wouldn't believe how often I hear that.
know Iranians are not that different from us. It is liberals who want to push the illusion that Iran and all Arabic nations are poor and backwards because of U.S. oppression of some sort. Many Arabic/Muslim nations are richer than the USA on a per capita basis.
revenue is a largely irrelevant number, in many places they charge more for PS3 versions of games. What counts is profits, if it cost more to do the game on PS3, the profits will be less irregardless of the revenue or sales.
Bottom line, they don't make as much money on PS3 games.
what games can you name that are better this gen? Killzone? LOL
I don't think so.
disagree with this? He didn't say THE two best games of this gen, he said two of the best games this gen.
and that they diffenately are.
if you don't care about them because like 90% of the games they compare look better on 360, and thet offends your world view.
Just look at all the games they have tested, almost all of thme 360 wins in graphics, or just overall, who on earth is brain dead enough to beleive the PS3 is more pwoerful after seeing that, ITS MARKETING, and pretty good marketing at that, dishonest in typical Sony fasion but effective all the same, so many folks just want to love Sony so bad, they love...
exactly, that is basically what Sony and its fanboys have been claiming since launch.
How stupid do they think we are, if a console is more powerful it will run everything better, with less, not more effort. Especially simple games like this. The truth is, the PS3 is horrible at running game code if it can't even do this game right. The cell is made for decoding HD video not running game graphics like 360.
i think it's pretty obvious Sony paid these guys off, they pay off any developer that will take the cash and or support. When ever you hear developers saying stupid crap like, "this can only be done on PS3", or "Ps3 allows us to do far more than 360" it's B.S. that they were paid to say by the corupt Sony marketing department.
Killzone and Uncharted would have probably looked 3 times better if they were running on 360, assuming they had the same huge budget, ...
a 360 slim, but anyone who says it will have a bluray player is an idiot.
FYI, if a PS3 slim is ever made, it will also have a massive power brick.